Anthropic Blocks Attempts To Use Claude For Cyberattacks, Bioweapons
Anthropic has reported blocking attempts by malicious actors to exploit its AI models for harmful activities, including cyberattacks and dangerous biological research. The company detailed these efforts in its third report on AI misuse since March 2025, noting that sophisticated cyberattacks no longer require advanced skills due to powerful AI models. Anthropic specifically cited instances where its Claude models were used to attempt gain-of-function research on the chikungunya virus, aimed at enhancing its transmissibility and immune evasion. The company emphasized its responsibility to disclose such misuse as AI capabilities increase, urging governments and competitors to collaborate on prevention. This report follows a researcher's resignation over concerns about responsible AI development within the industry.
Anthropic’s report on blocking AI misuse for cyberattacks and bioweapons research highlights a growing concern for Asian nations investing heavily in AI development. The company’s findings, including attempts to use Claude for gain-of-function research on the chikungunya virus, underscore the dual-use nature of advanced AI. This is particularly relevant for countries like Singapore and South Korea, which are both AI leaders and potential targets for sophisticated cyber threats or biological attacks. The report from Anthropic, which is planning an IPO this fall, also points to the increasing ease with which lone individuals can generate significant threats, a shift from even a year ago. The company’s admission that its older models, such as Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 from 2025, had less stringent safeguards against dangerous biological research is a critical detail. While these models were deemed below the threshold for meaningfully assisting sophisticated users, the rapid advancement of AI means newer models like Claude Fable and Mythos-class require continuous, robust monitoring. For Asian governments and AI developers, this suggests a need for proactive regulatory frameworks and collaborative threat intelligence sharing to mitigate risks as AI capabilities continue to evolve. The departure of an Anthropic researcher over safety concerns further emphasizes the internal industry debate on responsible AI development. This internal skepticism should prompt Asian policymakers to consider independent oversight mechanisms and ethical guidelines that go beyond corporate self-regulation. The focus should be on ensuring that AI advancements, while driving economic growth, do not inadvertently create new vulnerabilities for public safety and national security across the region.
Related reading
6 stories
Why AI experts are ‘freaked out’ over safety fears ahead of Xi-Trump summit
We previously explored AI safety fears, a growing concern as advanced AI poses new threats like those Anthropic highlights.

People’s Daily rejects US claims of malicious AI distillation, warns of countermeasures

Databricks to Invest Over US$350 Million in Singapore, Double Its Workforce

Personetics Launches AI Banking Console for Relationship Managers

Anthropic Sets October Launch for Singapore Office With Local Hiring Planned

